“We act in accordance with our self-image” Moshé Feldenkrais

“We act in accordance with our self-image. This self-image—which, in turn, governs our every act—is conditioned in varying degree by three factors: heritage, education, and self-education.”
–– Moshé Feldenkrais, Preface to Awareness through Movement. 1972, 1977

“In those moments when awareness succeeds in being at one with feeling, senses, movement, and thought, the carriage will speed along on the right road. Then man can make discoveries, invent, create, innovate, and know He grasps that his small world and the great world around are but one and that in this unity he is no longer alone.”
–– Moshé Feldenkrais , page 54 Awareness through Movement. 1972, 1977

2 replies
  1. happybones
    happybones says:

    Abstract
    “In a recent article, Leonard Geller (1982) criticized the concept of self-actualization as developed by Carl Rogers and Abraham Maslow on both theoretical and empirical grounds. His critique is based upon an assumption of a psychosocial understanding of self and a linear thinking approach to the human context. In this article, it is argued that the use of the term “self” in the human potential movement is fundamentally somatic and that linear thought, as it is usually understood is inappropriate to understanding concepts such as self and autonomy as well as any living system. The roots of such a somatic understanding are explored in systems biology and the formalizations of a logic of self-reference. A development notion of self-image is then sketched based on self-distinction as the central element.” –– Carl Ginsburg Toward a Somatic Understanding of Self: A Reply to Leonard Geller Journal of Humanistic Psychology Volume 24, Issue 2 https://doi.org/10.1177/0022167884242

    Reply
  2. happybones
    happybones says:

    References for Carl Ginsburg Toward a Somatic Understanding of Self: A Reply to Leonard Geller Journal of Humanistic Psychology Volume 24, Issue 2 https://doi.org/10.1177/0022167884242
    * Bach-y-Rita, P. (1972). Brain mechanisms in sensory substitution. New York: Academic Press.
    * Bateson, G. (1979). Mind and nature:A necessary unity. New York: E. P. Dutton.
    * Bekesy, G. von . (1967). Sensory inhibition. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
    * Clynes, M. (1977). Sentics: The touch of emotions. New York: Anchor Press/Doubleday.
    * Eibl-Eibesfelt, I. (1970). Ethology: The biology of behavior. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
    * Eigen, M., et al. (1981). “The origin of genetic information.” Scientific American, 244(4), 88-118.
    * Feldenkrais, M. (1972). Awareness through movement. New York: Harper & Row, 1972.
    * Feldenkrais, M. (1981). The elusive obvious. Cupertino, CA: Meta Publications.
    * Furth, H. G. (1969). Piaget and knowledge: Theoretical foundations. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
    * Gardiner, H. (1984). Art, mind and brain: A cognitive approach to creativity. New York: Basic Books.
    * Geller, L. (1982). The failure of self-actualization theory: A critique of Carl Rogers and Abraham Maslow. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 22(2), 56-73.
    * Hanna, T. (1975). Three elements of somatology: Preface to a holistic medicine and to a humanistic psychology. Main Currents, 31(3), 82-87.
    * Kurtz, R. (1981). Training manual: Ron Kurtz method of body centered psychotherapy. Boulder, CO: Hakomi Institute.
    * Lorenz, K. (1977). Behind the mirror: A searchfor the natural history of human knowledge. New York: Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich.
    * Malson, L. (1972). Wolf children and the problem of human nature. New York: Monthly Review Press.
    * Maslow, A. H. (1968). Toward a psychology of being. New York: Van Nostrand.
    * Maslow, A. H. (1971). The farther reaches of human nature. New York: Viking.
    * Mead, G. H. (1934). Mind, self and society: From the standpoint of a social behaviorist. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    * Pribram, K. H. (1971). Languages of the brain: Experimental paradoxes and principles in neuropsychology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
    * Prigogine, I. (1980). From being to becoming: Time and complexity in the physical sciences. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.
    * Reinstein, P. (n.d.). Private communication.
    * Rogers, C. R. (1961). On becoming a person. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
    * Spencer-Brown, G. (1969). Laws of form. London: George Allen and Unwin.
    * Varela, F. J. (1979). Principles of biological autonomy. New York: North Holland.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Want to join the discussion?
Feel free to contribute!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *